Visit Tasha's Web site

Visit Laura's Web site

Visit Regina's Web site

Visit Diana's Web site

Visit Sara's Web site

  • Tess Gerritsen
  • Surrounded on Three Sides
  • What Fresh Hell is This?
  • Rosett Writes Blog
  • Laurie R. King -- Mutterings
  • Galleycat
  • Sarah Stewart Taylor
  • Contemporary Nomad
  • Alexandra Sokoloff
  • Femmes Fatales
  • Bookseller Chick
  • Killer Year
  • Amelia Peabody
  • Tim Maleeny
  • J.T. Ellison
  • The Sphere
  • Meritorious Mysteries
  • The Outfit
  • First Offenders
  • Off The Page
  • Murderati
  • Killer Hobbies
  • Edwardian State of Mind
  • Refrigerator Door
  • Grace Notes
  • Murder She Writes
  • Naked Authors
  • Debutante Ball
  • Southern Comfort
  • A Newbie's Guide to Publishing
  • Miss Snark
  • The Girl Detective Blog
  • Book Daddy
  • The Little Blog of Murder
  • Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
  • Elizabeth Peters
  • The Lipstick Chronicles
  • A Dark Planet
  • Book Square
  • Overboard
  • Poisoned Pen Letters
  • Julia Buckley
  • Reviewed by Liz
  • Cozy Chicks Blog
  • Anatomy of a Book Deal
  • The Mystery Chicks
  • Loading ... Loading ...
    Polls Archive

      Design by
      DreamForge Media

      RSS 2.0
      Comments RSS 2.0
      Valid XHTML

    Mind the Gap

    Sara Rosett Icon

    I have a confession to make. A few weeks ago I watched The Saint—great movie. Then I went back and watched it again, but this time I listened to the audio commentary. The sad thing is, I do this quite often now.

    Pathetic, I know. I’m sure some of you GG blog readers out there are thinking, “Poor girl, she needs a life.” I’ll admit it’s kind of weird and most people probably don’t listen to the audio commentary, but keep in mind that it was Friday night, Mr. Pilot Guy was away, and I was basically burning time so that when I went to bed, I’d fall asleep in an exhausted heap.

    You find out all kinds of interesting tidbits from audio commentary: how the scenes were shot, how actors were chosen, what scenes were improvised, which days the weather didn’t cooperate, why the movie ends the way it does instead of with the alternate ending that’s on the Bonus Features.

    See, I love to find out how things are put together. Behind the scene details fascinate me. I’m a sucker for those tear-jerking background stories about athletes that air during the Olympics. I want to know how Extreme Makeover: Home Edition really builds a house in a week. You know there has to be a ton of pre-planning, pre-positioning, etc.

    I think that’s why I love mysteries—I like trying to uncover the carefully hidden clues and find out who did it. But reading mysteries and writing mysteries are two different things. I found that out the hard way. I flailed around for months, trying to figure out the structure of a mystery when I first attempted to write one. I eventually figured out the basics of plotting, but I’ve finally found a book that explains plot in more depth than anything I’ve read before. It’s Story by Robert McKee.

    I picked up the book because I signed up to attend the Sisters in Crime Goes to Hollywood workshop. We’re going to learn how to pitch and sell our work to Hollywood. I decided I’d better check out this scriptwriting thing. Since I’ve never attempted to write a script (or actually thought about writing a script) I picked up a few books on scriptwriting, including McKee’s tome.

    It’s about two inches thick and it doesn’t focus on formatting or general guidelines for selling your screenplay. It dissects how to tell a good story. Some of the explanations are a bit too erudite for me. Like this one:

    “When objective necessity contradicts a character’s sense of probability, a gap suddenly cracks open in the fictional reality. This gap is the point where the subjective and the objective realms collide…” Page 148.

    What he means is a character expects one thing to happen and it doesn’t, forcing the character to make another choice, take another action, but it involves bigger risk.

    Simon (Val Kilmer) in The Saint expected to complete a simple job (steal the formula for cold fusion from a scientist and rake in enough money to retire from being a professional thief), but a gap opens in his reality when he meets the scientist, Emma (Elizabeth Shue), and realizes that she’s not what he thought. She’s an innocent mixed up with the Russian mafia. He also starts to fall for her, but that is a subplot and the subject of another chapter in McKee’s book. Simon is faced with a choice. Go ahead and steal the formula and hurt Emma or don’t steal the formula and get on the bad side of the Russian mafia. I won’t give away anymore details in case someone wants to rent the movie and dissect the plot for themselves.

    So that’s my guilty, slightly embarrassing pleasure, audio commentary. Now I’m off to look for the first gap in my synopsis that is driving me crazy, but since I’ve thrown out one of my guilty pleasures, feel free to share what you indulge in. Remember, confession is good for the soul and blogs have a curiously anonymous feel.

    9 Responses to “Mind the Gap”

    1. Sara, I love the commentary feature on DVDs too. I listen to it all the time now. It’s very interesting. I have some Sherlock Holmes ones that have fascinating commentaries–and Mr. Thrilling has a noir set with all these film critics chiming in. Really enlightening.

      by Diana Killian on August 30th, 2006 at 3:29 pm

    2. You mean I’m not alone! Great news!

      by Sara Rosett on August 30th, 2006 at 6:43 pm

    3. The only one I’ve ever listened to was Emma Thompson and (?) one of the producers (?) talking over Sense and Sensibility. (Yes, I do have to watch that movie once a week). It is wonderfully chatty and full of great tidbits like how the wooly sheep kept fainting since it was so hot, and how they had to be careful to keep the highway out of the sweeping shots of English countryside. Also, how they managed to get the inimitable Ang Lee to direct.
      Other guilty pleasures include mindlessly link hopping from site to site on the Internet - funny where things lead - and reading the encyclopedia and the almanac - kind of like reading all the Trivial Pursuit cards. Fascinating stuff.

      by Heidi Vornbrock Roosa on August 31st, 2006 at 7:55 am

    4. I’m more of an outtake person. I enjoy the screw-ups.
      As for a guilty pleasure, and a rather odd one at that, I like to take those stupid AOL news quiz things on Friday. Just to see how much I remember from a week’s worth of splash screens. I pretty much stink at it, but I’m not one to give up easily.

      by Laura on August 31st, 2006 at 12:07 pm

    5. I like the outtakes, too. Basically, any bonus feature is great for me!

      Interesting about out guilty pleasures–taking news quizzes and reading the dictionary. I’d have expected something with chocolate. Oh, wait–we’ve already covered that pleasure and we didn’t feel guilty about it at all!

      by Sara Rosett on August 31st, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    6. Exactly! You said GUILTY pleasure. I have absolutely NO guilt where chocolate is concerned. As long as it stays off my hips and my stomach–I can eat as much as I want.

      by Laura on August 31st, 2006 at 3:40 pm

    7. I have way too many guilty pleasures.

      *Black Pepper Jack Doritos
      *The E! True Hollywood Story (we don’t get cable any more, so I haven’t seen it in years, but used to watch it all the time)
      *Bad Reality TV (yes, I know, redundant): Amazing Race, Survivor, The Bachelor, whatever. Although they get old and boring fast.

      But I miss the good old days when Fox showed Beverly Hills 90210 and Melrose Place on the same night. My husband and I used to sit and mock them both mercilessly…until we got sucked in and really cared whether Dylan picked Kelly or Brenda, whether Amanda was finally going to get what was coming to her.

      Geesh. Why don’t they put those out on DVD????

      by Tasha Alexander on August 31st, 2006 at 4:38 pm

    8. I am devoted to the audio commentaries. I feel a bit cheated if there isn’t one, or if it’s banal.

      I watch things twice actually: first without, then with.

      I’m so glad to see I’m not quit as addlepated as I’d feared!

      by Miss Snark on September 10th, 2006 at 6:21 pm

    9. It’s so good to know that there are other audio commentary fans out there. And now we also know what snacks to bring for B’con. Bring on those Doritos!

      by Sara Rosett on September 11th, 2006 at 1:51 pm

    Leave a Reply